NGL there's something soothing about having legitimate reasons to dislike verstappen again instead of just being bored he's winning

NGL there's something soothing about having legitimate reasons to dislike verstappen again instead of just being bored he's winning

https://youtu.be/ER4_6N86M_U?si=VtOOy-KTPVQuwgWW

vibe architect for /opacity --
host of vibe check podcast 
▶️ https://pods.media/vibe-check
❄️ icebreaker.xyz/dawufi
👀 seemore.tv/free/fc/dawufi

Head of Engineering at Courtyard.io, bringing physical collectibles onchain. nf.td/joe /courtyard /backend

yeah that's fax

honestly if he was pushing george off i wouldn't care but im a stando so here we are, hating max again

feelsgoodman

A teller / of stories, that is me. / Curious to learn new ways to see. / Proud dad of two. Now, what / about you? | Builds https://paragraph.xyz/@trpplffct

Legitimate is at least we can have a discussion about whether or not there was any wrong doing, penalties deserved, etc

I can't hate on Max for just winning - that is the most boring version of F1

Also I think they're smart not bringing data into this if the goal is views and engagement. Data is good for penalties but terrible for stoking the flames of rivalry :)

Okay, but what is legitimate? I think it' an interesting analysis, and I agree with the conclusion that nothing big really happened. It was only a small touch. But the fault is put with Max based on the assumption that Max moved under breaking. He denies that he did that. Now, I believe you could see that back in the data. Why is Palmer not using that data to prove his point?
Anyway, Max fights hard, had a big penalty of 10 seconds for inly a minor touch. I'm not disliking him for that. Exciting racing, I like it. Lando's car was damaged because he drove to the pit too fast and tore up his tyre the smacked his car to pieces. Not because Max drove him into a wall. That would be a different story.

Loving the energy in the channel this week.

540 $degen