Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Semi-regular Warpcast annoyances thread If you were BDFOWF, what would you have us work on? BDFOWF = benevolent dictator for one warpcast feature
106 replies
4 recasts
80 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
i'd like an option to hide all replies / recasts / main casts from low quality users across main feed, trending, and all channels
5 replies
0 recast
22 reactions

streetphotography.eth 🐘 pfp
streetphotography.eth 🐘
@streetphoto
“Non active” badge users perhaps? Or is that too vague
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
too simple. it will be tough to nail down since it is actually quite hard to get the active badge with the 400 follower requirement. there are some interesting people here looking for genuine conversation who won't hit that 400 follower limit for awhile and i don't want to block them from being found.
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

streetphotography.eth 🐘 pfp
streetphotography.eth 🐘
@streetphoto
Yep I agree, what are some other more visible factors that determine user “quality” other than Active Badge?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Datasnoot pfp
Datasnoot
@datasnoot.eth
Its a really tough question, there aren't a ton of available data points to use, and it can always be gamed. Generally I would think higher quality users have: - Longer average casts - higher cast to recast ratio - extremely low amount of duplicate casts ie always spamming the same things
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction