Content pfp
Content
@
https://veryinter.net/person
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž pfp
Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž
@darrylyeo
A tool to automatically “format” your filesystem for you. Wouldn’t that be nice.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Mo pfp
Mo
@meb
I just want to let an AI run loose on my file system and reorganise my documents perfectly
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž pfp
Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž
@darrylyeo
YES Who’s building this?? https://warpcast.com/darrylyeo/0x845ee642
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mo pfp
Mo
@meb
Honestly I wish it were a thing that exists. Apparently GenZ+ just use search functions; but I like having a clean taxonomy of my data ecosystem
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž pfp
Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž
@darrylyeo
I have been down the “graph-based filesystems” rabbit hole so many times it’s not even funny. Hierarchical file systems are simply not enough. https://github.com/danieleds/GFS
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mo pfp
Mo
@meb
Cool! Is this basically a collection of virtual hierarchical file systems with each node being a pointer to the underlying app? Honestly that would work great for an AI. It wouldn’t even need to modify my filesystem, just spin up a new virtual hierarchy for me
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž pfp
Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž
@darrylyeo
Sort of – presumably you’d have an app or indexer that understands the format and can correlate similarly-named folders as the same “category” or “tag”. Like all the folders named after a given year, for example, no matter now arbitrarily nested they are in the hierarchy. Using symlinks / hard links as a lightweight indexing layer would be a cool approach though.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mo pfp
Mo
@meb
Honestly this is the way to go and to build it. Don’t give AI write access to the underlying system. Just let it create multiple taxonomies around areas you care about
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions