composability

this is both true but wrong

besides the facts people like to pay other people and this increases their satisfaction with the experience, and that people like to collect things, and people like artifacts with their name and face on it

the add a silly mint is like amoeba version of what might be built out of world with durable public social little artifacts like this floating around, getting combined and remixed, etc

Open question: how do we incentivize crypto apps and onchain experiences to be composable and remixable, so we’re not just accumulating a junk drawer of useless collectibles in our wallets?

Building @warpcast and @farcaster / dad / like to read, cook, ski, code

I can see this but I also can’t. I used to feel this way but then realized I was amassing a giant digital junk drawer. 

I felt bad too because during a down market I spent $$ that appreciated so rapidly in the recovery that I felt stupid because in hindsight I was paying way too much for trinkets. It made me very wary of spending ETH. 

I want to share the optimism that people will use the composability and extensibility of these artifacts in cool ways. I will meditate on that

/frontend dev (HTML/CSS)・founder/decentralized data wrangler /blockhead・contributor /ethglobal /walletbeat・hackathon bounty hunter・music maker・dropout・nomad・25

https://warpcast.com/keccers.eth/0xfda0afe4

it has to be obvious and beneficial 

metadata problem