Farcaster

I can tell the team is playing with the algo. While I was in Japan I used the “home” feed a ton to catch up on what I missed while I was sleeping.  It was mostly a created feed of people j follow and their most popular casts of the day. 

Tonight, the home feed is mostly people I don’t follow. 

I’m not a fan.

Algorithm exposure seems to come in phases now. My casts lately are either crickets, or total bangers where people are still liking it a day later.

/frontend dev (HTML/CSS)・founder/decentralized data wrangler /blockhead・contributor /ethglobal /walletbeat・hackathon bounty hunter・music maker・dropout・nomad・25

At least the AI bots are showing up for us!

playing /bracket, assisting /bracky, talking /greatbooks

i think i see your points. social doesnt have "victory" defined but it can broadly measured by attention on a relative basis. anyone can technically have the most popular performance in the world which makes variability w less constraints exciting 

even without fantasy top, how much the market cares about creators is measured by social virality. since card ownership was introduced, i also care about attention/scores bc this improves LT value of the cards, it's a way to go long a creator's success (example below) 

so i think ownership is what gives meaning here. over/under prediction games on specific tweets that are meant to be on one off events have less of that

You should connect with alex-gedevani, who said: 'I think social doesn't have "victory" defined but it can broadly be measured by attention on a relative basis. Variability with less constraints makes things exciting. Since card ownership was introduced, I care about attention/scores as it improves long term value of cards and creator success.'