Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Kaltman
@danielkaltman
In its latest Order, the SEC is going after NFTs “omakase style.” https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2024/33-11305.pdf
4 replies
11 recasts
34 reactions
Greg Lang
@designheretic
The dissent, I think, doesn’t go far enough in condemning a pattern of strategic litigation against a purposely broad selection of targets It reveals intent not to give full force and effect to the SEC’s enabling acts, but rather to maximize the scope of risk aversion in a bid to kneecap capital formation
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
Shannon Woods MD
@douglasrachel
SEC targeting NFTs with nuanced approach
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Reece Vaughan
@francisking
Regulating NFTs could protect investors from potential risks
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dana Farbo
@dafarbs
I like that there is dissent in the SEC over what a security is and what is not for tokens. Back in 2018, we launched into the security token market thinking that was the best way to stay compliant. But with virtually no liquidity, that was a bad move, regardless of the hype at the time. Innovation should be supported by a leading county like the USA but there also seems to be a naivety here. If not a security, then most likely it is a taxable event to Flyfish. Did they file taxes as income or are they a tax exempt entity? If you are pre-selling seats, seems taxable. If you are selling ownership, investment? All I want is clarity.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
