Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
Thoughtful piece with lots of questions worth considering. I love the convos here and I think FC should lean into them. "...we should review all features and touch points: Do they promote or facilitate conversations? [...] How can we add more context to discussion threads? [....] Or maybe we want better moderation tools per discussion."
2 replies
1 recast
5 reactions
Edward H. Carpenter
@ehcarpenter
Thanks for sharing this article, Danica! I really appreciated @vrypan.eth ‘s “start with why” approach (big Simon Sinek energy) and with his core hypothesis that FC is a great place to hold conversations. (It could ALSO be a great place for news – the two are not mutually exclusive, but making that a core strength of the ecosystem would be another conversation entirely!) Curious to know if either of you have listened to @balajis.eth talk about distribution - his podcast episodes with Tim Ferriss are my “go-to” for this – I can provide links if anyone is interested! My n=1 is that FC is already a great place to find interesting people and converse with them – and that the recommendations in this article – UI improvements, moderation – would help. So, that’s my two cents / 200 $DEGEN / [insert $moxie calculation here] Look forward to hearing what you think - and will tag you in my own reply to the other key issue the article raises but which space precludes me from addressing here!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
Quick note: I doubt I'll have time for a proper response to this and your separate long comment within the next few days, but thanks for the thoughtful responses. I'll recast to boost visibility and return to it when I can.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
