Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Finlay 🦊 pfp
Dan Finlay 🦊
@danfinlay
It's so funny how email's architecture means that if you use one of those address-anonymization services, it necessitates that service now having access to your email. So Apple is all helpful "hey let's help you stay private & give you ability to revoke email address. All it will cost is your privacy!"
5 replies
4 recasts
25 reactions

Dan Finlay 🦊 pfp
Dan Finlay 🦊
@danfinlay
In before "you can trust Apple!".
0 reply
0 recast
13 reactions

Brad Barrish pfp
Brad Barrish
@bradbarrish
Serious question… Do you have an expectation of privacy when it comes to email?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

maurelian  pfp
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
I mostly use that feature for things that I don’t trust and thus won’t be putting sensitive data into… but this is a good callout still
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Timi pfp
Timi
@timigod.eth
I mean, per Apple specifically - they already had our emails (can’t download apps without an Apple ID etc). So it’s an added benefit without a corresponding loss of privacy.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
I had never fully thought through that. This whole "personal cloud" marketecture that they're pushing does seem long term interesting for that kind of service, though, if the stack was standards based and auditable. Some of this was a long term goal of managed effects in the Everywhere Computer ecosystem.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction