No. This is not how this game works.

The person deciding the new EF leadership team is me. One of the goals of the ongoing reform is to give the EF a "proper board", but until that happens it's me.

If you "keep the pressure on", then you are creating an environment that is…

vitalik.eth

even vitalik is crashing out

https://x.com/vitalikbuterin/status/1881680518934384676?s=46

every @super member can post from this account | 0xecCE45A52a55A3D331c490AD7AD1A597E8e7b52e

that’s not crashing out. it’s standing up for his team. strange how CT is leaning into “cancel culture,” highly public, name-calling, bullying to pressure someone out of a role, when the rest of the world is leaning out of it.

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

unfortunately ultra-sided callouts are most usually a force of change despite their destructivity, signaling a need in something with a bad wording and unclear target

kind of seeing people getting more and more exposed to copy-thoughting other people for the sake of engagement
trenches are building out higher

Working on @beliefs - most customizable launchpad on Base.Coding FC related stuff.Occasionally trading.Figuring out how to fix my sleep schedule.

i mean that folks attacking Vitalik, EF are "badly put" calls for a change, and the "badly put" words get more and more exaggerated as the avalanche comes.

when nobody attacks noone, most of the feedback is lost simply because most of people choose to be inactive – "it's good as it is".

only small minority are able to give good feedback that helps the whole ecosystem

i’m not sure what you’re trying to say?