Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

David @Farcon pfp
David @Farcon
@d
My thoughts on @zora Yes, the token "for fun" is not a great narrative, but it's likely a protection measure. @haunventures is the main investor, and they take regulation very seriously Yes, revenue is low, but IG had 30M users when acquired and had ZERO revenues 2M traders, 100k unique creators, 4k daily creators, economic activity, there’s something Zora team has explored, shipped and pivoted, and this token may evolve into exposure into something larger In web2, engagement drives ad placement costs. In Zora, attention is also valuable, but in this case, instead of Ads, content is coined and traded freely ā€œunlockingā€ it’s speculative value, but it’s that, speculation, brands don’t get anything for buying tokens, no ads placement or convertion into core actions (CPAs) The unlock: Merge the models Place personalized ads on the apps, but offer revenue share with content coin holders, and/or offer ad placement to content
3 replies
1 recast
11 reactions

Cyber Shakti šŸŽ©šŸ˜‡šŸ˜ˆšŸ’ƒ pfp
Cyber Shakti šŸŽ©šŸ˜‡šŸ˜ˆšŸ’ƒ
@cybershakti
Really resonates, also read your thoughts via email on adcoins. we’ve been thinking / shipping along similar lines at @poster The ā€œmerge the modelsā€ concept especially. There’s a lot to explore here. Leaving you with this thought - how do we go about making the Ads seem more native/creator driven - is crucial for web3 imho + the app consumption /retention for consumer dapps is also a BIG problem. Have been solving for this silently on our clock. Would be great to sync and trade notes when you’re up for it.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction