Decentralized social networks need to have protections against name squatting, unwanted content, and spam. If they're purely permissionless then they don't make for good experiences.

The protections should be systematic and not arbitrary

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

nah
https://warpcast.com/cryptogoddess/0x82f5d2

The OP does not imply that the protections should be arbitrary.

I dont think Dan sending a DM is either transparent nor consistent. Would he do the same for a twitter with 2k followers ? 

nah
https://warpcast.com/cryptogoddess/0x9ce4d1c68d45c7958276e6744d97da7abc75f0ee

nah
https://warpcast.com/nor/0xc28480fd4582f92ff5f52211f9a243fe38747cf3