CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑ on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑ pfp

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑

@cryptoforchange

IMO the path higher is going down is too passive. Too much of just sitting back and saying “hey you can come build on top of h”. Higher needs to turn the switch and become aggressive in seeking talent and PAYING for it. I don’t know exactly what the best flow for this is… could be focusing on some listings.. could be focusing on finding accounts on X who have influence. Could be trying to onboard some well known builders to higher… prolly all these need to happen and fast.

6 replies

1 recast

22 reactions

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑ pfp

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑

@cryptoforchange

https://warpcast.com/martin/0x9d054297 Example here, asking for people to just do this level of work without any pay. Like I get they can hold the token and go do these things to pump their bags but that is a lot of risk without any guarantee of reward. If it was a big opportunity people would be chomping at the bit to lead these roles. We have to do better and aim higher.

3 replies

0 recast

10 reactions

↑ antaur ツ pfp

i know I felt addressed but then thought, nah, sounds too complicated, like a DAO that doesn't even wanna be a DAO. If higher party had been more strategic with $LUM and other assets we could sit on a nice treasury to buy back higher and distribute to roles. I have some skin in the game but won't feel incentivised to 'work for my bags' until 250M FDV

1 reply

0 recast

6 reactions

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑ pfp

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑

@cryptoforchange

I would agree. Like /higher has not reached the level of escape velocity that people just want to chip in for free and grind hard. Trying to not midcurve higher in my head but honestly I am not seeing the dots connect the way I had hoped. I would say even something as simple as the giveaway @lght.eth did over thanksgiving. I have not seen an update on this and I even offered in the DMs to double the amount to try and incentivize people to try @polmaire.eth app more. Never heard back and still don't know if anyone actually got any h from that promo The ball is in our side of the court but we are all standing at the 3 point line waiting for a coach to call the play... when there is no coach.

2 replies

0 recast

5 reactions

LGHT pfp

guys lol. i’ve tried many times (not specifically just to you but to the meta of this critique) i’m gonna have to be a bit more direct here now: 1. if you don’t feel incentivized to work on higher until it is 7.8x from here and over 2x from local ath that’s totally fine but we don’t have much to discuss atm 2. nobody here is forcing you to do anything. we are suggesting 3. everyone who is trying to figure out this project (which no one has successfully figured out yet btw) is just working on the stuff and trying to get it over the line if we come to the channel and talk about trying to get touch grass event planned for 2025, or the higher factory onchain merch protocol, or the notion doc fc sign in crowdfund app, or the redesign of the higher site, or the verification of the x profile, or the fireside chats in believin, the model training for aether, the media vertical for higher+, the react native app for everyone to meme, the space project, merch collab w f0da, & on & on the list goes ↓

2 replies

0 recast

18 reactions

↑ antaur ツ pfp

connecting the dots - that's the key thing and that's a role that some people need to do. Who is playing this role? If you do, it's not transparent to me. I am a systemic coach and group facilitator IRL. Funnily enough I know how this stuff works. Yet, I have tried a few times to connect myself to the higher OGs like @martin and @lght.eth and felt like I failed. Didn't capture attention. Got great feedback in some 1:1s from others in the network, but interesting that despite the aim to be headless, there is the centre of gravity around the OGs, the founders, the "source" (ref Peter Koenig)

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction