HIGHER

ok now for sake of empathy i ask that you look at how hard it has been for you to come up with stuff

& imagine trying to scale this thing:

w no funding (we’d have to sell our tokens to get it which is counterproductive) 

no official team or corporate structure 

no roadmap 

-

we’re further than most erc20 ‘communities’ have ever been & i say this not as a ‘please lay off’. i say this as a ‘look what we’re still able to do’ 

so again, time. it’s gonna take way more time than anyone wants to accept

I keep thinking about those last 2 points - we’ve got more going on than coins with 10x the MC. 

Weird that no one asks for details on how $fartcoin will translate its network value back into the token price

Designer, engineer. Onchain arts & crafts.

This has to be one of the main things in my head that makes me want to run into a wall over and over. I look around at the shitpool of tokens out there and see the insane valuations yet see something like higher struggling to gain traction in the wider market. 

Where is the disconnect? Is the space really that gated by the KOLs who influence everyone on what to buy?

Buildoor in the web3 space. Fully trained to shill any crypto on my podcast TheNextBlock.

Going higher in /higher channel

One is a lotto, the other a network you grow with. Yes, the network takes longer, but it's also much more fulfilling and resilient

However, I agree that higher core needs to aim at composability, so people know how they can start building in the ecosystem

For a company, I'd usually do that with a workshop. But I think it's important to look at use cases. What projects would be beneficial, what are their needs, what do we already have, what do we need to build for a functioning mvp, prioritize, task delegation etc.

And then put the system in a frame with checkboxes (could actually be nfts) that links to the respective repository