Corbin Page pfp
Corbin Page
@corbin.eth
What's your most controversial take on Threads? Mine: Really interesting to see text content from my IG social graph, which is mainly old friends, influencers, and meme accounts. Not sure if it's good or bad (probably bad) but makes you realize how different your algo is across different social apps.
7 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Eric P. Rhodes pfp
Eric P. Rhodes
@epr
mine: threads will do more to change microblogging platform futures than decentralized social apps just because of the shear size of their network. it will show regular folk that there are other viable options. and open the floodgates for more innovation and awareness. a good thing for the DeSoc space imo.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
Good only because we are beginning to merge between the good and bad if different types of graphs. Personally donโ€™t care to have another app, but I am going to use it because I want to trickle the things Iโ€™ve learned in Farcaster to a different audience that is not familiar with this part of world.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
https://warpcast.com/matthew/0x65d20a
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ayush pfp
Ayush
@ayushm.eth
They should merge it with the Instagram app. Now, that would be a bold move. The only reason threads interest me is that my irl friends don't use twitter. I was hoping this would get them to use such platforms, but I don't see much excitement about it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tom Beck pfp
Tom Beck
@tombeck.eth
My controversial take is that I like it and I want it to succeed.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sanch pfp
Sanch
@sanchitram.eth
It seems refreshing coming from a group of people who did not design for text. I feel text and picture together is unsolved, and am curious to see how they unite both forms.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tuan Jones pfp
Tuan Jones
@tuanjones
Iโ€™m only okay with it without ads. Once ads come into play, Iโ€™ll give it less attention.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction