Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If we made normal frames more like composer actions (i.e. Telegram-style mini-apps), what would you build that you can't with frames today? The argument against is most people don't want use fully-featured apps in a squished window vs. in a separate app. When frames work well, it's because they are constrained with a clear call to action and meet users in the feed where they are spending time.
31 replies
7 recasts
43 reactions
Corbin Page
@corbin.eth
Would definitely build some mini-apps. ๐ Even common crypto actions like swaps, tips, mint, etc would benefit from having an active canvas. The full http call UX limits Frames to basic marketing actions vs true mini-apps that users expect. Mini-app momentum is just getting started and FC should be a major auth/social graph + crypto payment provider. Could be a standard that gets integrated everywhere around the Internet a la Blinks. Which would require a FC account to auth in. ๐ TG makes it easy to package up PWAs into mini-apps. FC could do the same with SIWF and then a crypto tx API.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions