Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jvmi
@jvmi
who wants pfps?
33 replies
30 recasts
240 reactions
⚪️ cooper 🎩 ↑
@cooperray
would prefer more proliferation of swatches and/or ways to interact with them. PFPs are a big yawn and distracting imho. gm
1 reply
1 recast
11 reactions
bry
@brykayne
I’m with @cooperray Would be cool if my swatch generated a pfp or if you, as the artist, could add a pfp based on my swatch attributes to my swatch art array. @transientlabs has this tech, called Doppelgänger. Might require a contract switch though.
1 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
⚪️ cooper 🎩 ↑
@cooperray
now we're talkin' love that. i didn't know transient built that - can you share an example Bryan? @jvmi tbh if planning a pfp project, would love to see something like this, playing into the swatch attributes + even a 1:1 to existing swatch tokenIDs.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
bry
@brykayne
If @jvmi likes the concept we can jam with @transientlabs & @davidfeinstein.eth Check https://launchpad.transientlabs.xyz/tech/erc7160tl for a bunch of concepts and more info on the contract they’ve built.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
David Feinstein🎩 ◹◺
@davidfeinstein.eth
good looks @brykayne ! can get you onboarded @cooperray // 7160 might be a cool feature and you can deploy on base ;)
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
⚪️ cooper 🎩 ↑
@cooperray
hey!! damn reading docs and ERC-7160 sounds sick. lots to iterate on with dynamic evolution of metadata and display! Im gona keep this in mind for some personal stuff :) As @brykayne mentioned, this was specifically if @jvmi was interested in something unique for a /swatches evolution.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
