Seeing a lot of discourse over the ongoing @optimism Onchain Builder round. 

The Foundation wants to reward builders - defined as protocols deploying factory contracts.

This means most creators and teams like @cooprecs driving usage to Zora or Sound etc. don’t qualify.

Thoughts?

I think the program design is perfectly legitimate and makes sense — *but* they did a bad job communicating eligibility limitations in the marketing and thus misled people (unintentionally). So now IMO they should make that good somehow

Onchain is the new online - FID 206 -  cooprecords.xyz

I think the program design is perfectly legitimate and makes sense — *but* they did a bad job communicating eligibility limitations in the marketing and thus misled people (unintentionally). So now IMO they should make that good somehow

https://optimism.mirror.xyz/nz5II2tucf3k8tJ76O6HWwvidLB6TLQXszmMnlnhxWU

internet rabbit • comms @ /splits • https://www.sonyasupposedly.com/

Oh man this language is interesting.

Tbh though I think that's probably across every round and Retro Funding in general - probably less dedicated towards this specific Onchain Builder round if I had to guess