Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
Pretty crazy to me the way we track referral rewards for mints is through a URL and not directly onchain. I have no clue what this looks like but feels broken that the way a mint fee is redirected is based on if you use the correct link someone shares or not. Feels like a lot of design space to improve this.
6 replies
18 recasts
276 reactions
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
The url just passes the params that get used in the mint function? The referral is (typically) onchain Or did you mean this another way?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Brian Flynn
@flynn.eth
How else do you imagine it working?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
NotFloris 🫂
@notfloris
On farcaster there should be a frame the handles referrals with one of the buttons to show on chain tracking stats. I’m sorry I can’t build it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zeos
@zeos
Perhaps to have the option would suffice The only argument I have for that is cost efficiency. Writing small strings of information is not cost effective. Definitely a question to ask a few times 😁
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Apurv
@apurvkaushal
referrals include solving for 1) who referred the new user 2) did they complete referral 2 is possible completely on- chain. 1 is tricky since most sources of communication b/w 2 users is web2 today & interacting with smart contracts means complex oracles in the middle. Native to Farcaster , this could be possible.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yusuff
@hysolac
$FCKN cool
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
