Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
Seeing a lot of discourse over the ongoing @optimism Onchain Builder round. The Foundation wants to reward builders - defined as protocols deploying factory contracts. This means most creators and teams like @cooprecs driving usage to Zora or Sound etc. don’t qualify. Thoughts?
18 replies
9 recasts
95 reactions
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
This is a tough - I see both sides. I would argue driving volume to contracts is more impactful than the deployment of those contracts. We drove 150k mints across 50+ artist wallets from 200+ songs but since they are Sound contracts - they likely don’t qualify. Tough pill to swallow but that’s showbiz
4 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
The funny part is the biggest driver of mints was us using Boosts to reward people with OP we got from RetroPGF Round 3. Good case study to reinforce that you always need to be evolving and it’s important to not be reliant on grants. Will be interesting to watch unfold!
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
In the exact same boat with Jeeves 10k+ smart wallets executing txs across protocols Technically not eligible -_-
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
the park
@thepark
Super confusing marketing pre this moment, feels like an oopsie, as an artist and collective that supports many doesn’t feel like “that’s showbiz” is fair, as all the people here can go elsewhere for “showbiz” respectfully
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
We are facing the same issues. Initially we launched the Kiwi News NFT as a meme (art work), 10 people minted. But since then, for a year, we have built an entire product and protocol around it, and it feels wrong that @zora gets to pocket all of the impact. We drove these sales, @zora did feature us
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
