Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

basil pfp
basil
@itsbasil
bad take? fc was bootstrapped by base (namely cb & ex-cb folks), op ppl & a subset of early adopters, predominantly native onchain builders who were interested in the tech it experienced its first big onboarding event at the interjection of base improvements & increased adoption, the introduction of frames & the rise of $degen those who got in on degen early, made a bunch of money & stayed, but are now exhausted by bad g(dau) those who were interested in frames, were likely the same folks who were early fc adopters & thus had little impact on daus those who were interested in base, were likely interested in profits & so either: -churned when base memes starting popping up on x & engagement/liquidity flatlined on fc -got burned on a newer fc meme & churned -or, stuck around to end up in $higher & others, like $ham/gaias—tho these projects are now looking at channel & chain alternatives as well so as ai interest churns, fc increasingly needs base & higher, but they become less dependent on fc
4 replies
3 recasts
28 reactions

Coop pfp
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
Absolutely based thread and take Great summary and very aligned with how I've seen everything play out as well. Have been a strong believe the success of FC is directly correlated to the number of FC-native tokens that are launched and boostrapped by the community here 1000 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction