Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
“Farcaster must remove all the bots” This is a worrying line of thinking I’m seeing more often. The argument goes that it’s not enough to hide uninteresting content. It *must* be removed from the protocol. That is, someone must judge the worthiness of accounts and delete them from the protocol.
58 replies
31 recasts
214 reactions

Devin Conley pfp
Devin Conley
@conley
Any related thoughts about hub sharding or syncing data subsets? Agreed that there should never be an explicit "ban" at the protocol level, but also hard to scale for smaller hub infra without any ability to prefer content of interest
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
thoughts on scaling: https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/163 tl;dr no plans to shard hubs until much larger scale (several TB+)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Devin Conley pfp
Devin Conley
@conley
ah great thread thanks
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction