0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
3 replies
4 recasts
23 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Thanks for sharing.
I've read through the whole thing.
9/10 as specific examples are important.
1)-3) & 6)-8) are clearly NO.
But 4) & 5) are difficult.
These are the feelings of the receiver, so I think they may be received differently than I think.
Then 10/10 4)
Does this mean that if I interact with someone who is labeled SPAM, that person is also SPAM?
If so, I think that might be taking the idea a little too far.
There is clearly a SPAM certification due to misidentification.
For example, this time Don was labeled SPAM.
There is no way he is a SPAM.
Perhaps some of the higher ups on this channel, including you, have interacted with him.
If 4) is correct, that would mean that many people at the top are SPAM.
I'm sorry it took so long.
Otherwise, I agree with you completely.
Anyway, the rules of the channel seem to be changing, and for the time being I will try to defend myself by avoiding anything that could be mistaken for SPAM as much as possible. 0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
