Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
One thing I was wrong about over the last few years: sign up costs would dramatically reduce spam. Turns out spam is a top 3 problem (aside from retention and infrastructure scaling) to solve for when building a permissionless decentralized social networking protocol. Spammers are willing to pay for sign ups at prices that normal users aren't. Spam is also relative: what's spammy for one person is not for another. Corollary: when you talk to developers building on Farcaster, spam is a top of mind issue whereas users giving product feedback but not actively building in the ecosystem tend to think this isn't that big an issue / not that hard a problem to solve. Also a good proxy for the quality of first principles thinking when suggesting "why don't you just do this?" if you haven't considered how would spammers abuse this and what's the solution.
28 replies
6 recasts
122 reactions
Commstark 🎩🫂
@commstark
utilize users to remove spam" according to Travels In The Land of Kublai Khan (marco polo), Kublai Khan wanted to build sidewalks in his city he demanded that each person spend a day build sidewalks in front of their house and connect it with their neighbours in a weekend the entire city had sidewalks we can learn from this
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What incentive do people have to do the work? What happens when one user thinks someone is not spammy and another does too? Spam is an ongoing indefinite problem. Building sidewalks is finite.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
