Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
One thing I was wrong about over the last few years: sign up costs would dramatically reduce spam. Turns out spam is a top 3 problem (aside from retention and infrastructure scaling) to solve for when building a permissionless decentralized social networking protocol. Spammers are willing to pay for sign ups at prices that normal users aren't. Spam is also relative: what's spammy for one person is not for another. Corollary: when you talk to developers building on Farcaster, spam is a top of mind issue whereas users giving product feedback but not actively building in the ecosystem tend to think this isn't that big an issue / not that hard a problem to solve. Also a good proxy for the quality of first principles thinking when suggesting "why don't you just do this?" if you haven't considered how would spammers abuse this and what's the solution.
28 replies
6 recasts
155 reactions
Commstark 🎩🫂
@commstark
utilize users to remove spam" according to Travels In The Land of Kublai Khan (marco polo), Kublai Khan wanted to build sidewalks in his city he demanded that each person spend a day build sidewalks in front of their house and connect it with their neighbours in a weekend the entire city had sidewalks we can learn from this
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What incentive do people have to do the work? What happens when one user thinks someone is not spammy and another does too? Spam is an ongoing indefinite problem. Building sidewalks is finite.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Dean Pierce 👨💻🌎🌍
@deanpierce.eth
Connect it with their neighbors 😁 I mark stuff I don't like as spam, and everyone else does too. My feed is filtered by my spam tags, and the spam tags of the people I follow. If I consistently find content I missed that says it was tagged as spam by someone I follow, I unfollow them. Incentives balance themselves.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Commstark 🎩🫂
@commstark
a bit of creativity can solve this an idea: 1) I remove my own spam - it’s just for my own feed 2) my spam removal + my onchain reputation score get pushed into a Farcaster spam filter 3) if me + 2/3/4 other reputable ppl spot the same spammer, spammer is removed 4) might be too outside the realm of FC but our spam reports feed into a Farcaster AI spam model to detect what is spam 5) individuals can choose to accept no spam filter, FC ai spam filter, or something in between the incentive is to make Farcaster cleaner… you’d be surprised how many of us would take up arms for a week if you and V asked us to the main idea is that you have an army of 1,000 trusted people willing to provide inputs.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
