There is zero chance that bot activity is worse on Warpcast than X. We're just so accustomed to it there that we've trained our muscles to tune it out. 

Whatever's happening with @zachxbt seems specific to him and maybe (?) some other highly visible names. 

Sucks that this is the case for someone we'd like to be here, but I also think he's seeing a narrow instantiation of the experience.

Looked through the replies on this one and it’s probably 90% people I know. Bot/spam activity has improved tremendously over the past 6 months so I’m definitely not seeing this. BUT my guess is his account might be a target. 

But also — I only saw 2 mean comments. What’s the mean comment/troll ratio compared to Twitter? Pretty sure we’re doing 100x better here.

FC DAU is overstated by at least 5X; the same doesn't hold true for Twitter, FB, IG, etc.

FC DAU is overstated by at least 5X; the same doesn't hold true for Twitter, FB, IG, etc. https://warpcast.com/cojo.eth/0x90d18f2b https://warpcast.com/nounishprof/0xe7e94086

I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics (SocialForensics.com) | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen

1. Are you talking about the protocol or a client?
2. Which definition of DAU are you using?
3. Who is overstating it?
4. Where are you getting private DAU data for Twitter?
5. How are you defining DAU on that platform? 
6. Who is making the declaration on those platforms?

1. Effectively WC *is* the protocol (though I am referencing FC)
2. One that doesn't include follow-for-follow sockpuppet networks (where hundreds/thousands of accounts are controlled by an individual/group).. to provide an example
3. Merkle (see screenshot for an example of dwr cheerleading an inflated DAU)
4. I have been swimming in Twitter data since 2017.. back when it was effectively an open data layer (lots of people with zero knowledge on this stuff offering up their opinions here)
5. Accounts that are active and don't violate their rules & policies https://help.x.com/en/rules-and-policies/authenticity
6. Many people here – yourself included – are leveraging whataboutism to justify FC's inflated DAU/protocol metrics ("There is zero chance that bot activity is worse on Warpcast than X")

Co-founder @ponder | @survey | Ex   | colinjohnson.io

Obviously Farcaster is a decentralized protocol, meaning you can't stop spammy content at the base level. It's at least as disingenuous to draw parallels between a protocol layer and a client app as it is to call potential bots DAU.

To determine the user experience honestly, you'd look at the visible posts and engagements displayed by the client. But that's not what you've done, because it wouldn't be as juicy of a story (and it's not readily available data).

Dan's bull post from 10 months ago is the smoking gun for the team somehow misleading people? That's laughable, the team literally created a public protocol so people like us could have ultimate transparency. A single exaggerated post from a year ago is a wild thing to clutch pearls over.