Part of my social media thesis, Farcaster, et al. and why it must be decentralized, is due to how the internet will become a hyper-social. environment.
For example, we should be able to become social on/off around activities, topics, and locations.
Right now, online social predominantly happens on location, IG, Twitter, etc, and then subsets into topics, driven by activity inside these locations.
Humans, for several generations, have the behavior of restructuring that order, topics, activity, location. It’s this behavior of rearranging the structure of being social that is still missing online.
Farcaster’s FIP-2 was a step in the right direction but adoption lacks because it’s still hindered by Warpcast, or clients that need location first adoption.
I’m not sure what breaks us out, but I do think the right path is the ability to LEGO the social chain. Which comes from decentralization somehow. 3 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction