Writing an article about governance and sensemaking, and I'm curious about what folks, especially women, in the DAO/governance space think/feel about this section, namely this distinction between systematic and empathic thinking, and how our collective discourse around governance is skewed to the former.

Organization services: www.clinamenic.com
 // 
Newsletter: solosalon.clinamenic.com // @journodao @opencivics // /journalism /philanthropy

The full draft so far:

https://paragraph.xyz/@scenius-gardens/preview/heIpmux7h0009qxOlKqu

building for human flourishing ✨
growth @glodollar 🍄
stewarding ottawa greenpill + rootedLAbs🌱
grants with @charmverse @gitcoin community council⚡️

Have worked on a few things. Focused on ZK, Compute, and Privacy for the DePIN economy currently. Forever friend of DeSci. 

Lawyer, reinventing law as technology enabling human collaboration. Web3 Magic, Evolution of Organizations, Personal Agency & Integration. Design.

@reneedaos.eth @lanadingwall @jupiterblock does any of this align with your experience/opinions?

Head of Community at Fuel | Founding member @journodao | 500RYT Yogi | Former Consensys & @unlockprotocol 

Wild West Native, building Chones.xyz and nurturing the Infinite Garden  /chones 

@cstreet @borrowlucid.eth @lizzybeth does any of this track?

This is echoed in a lot of DisCOs' mission and their critique of DAO's.. While some of their takes are quite naive, others (like this) are spot on.

Love to see this narrative emerging in the DAO space... Maybe soon these worlds can be bridged to serve one another. There's lots to learn!

69 $DEGEN