colfax on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

colfax pfp

hoping to receive network perspectives regarding @highersolana. writing to understand, not sure where this goes. share your opinions pls transparency -> i bought a bunch [addy: colfax.sol] [without selling any of my base $higher btw] there's been a lot of conversation of late about higher token price - also lack of money/funding/attention. solana has come up countless times as a potential solution to attention. is there potential for this to be meaningful to current $higher holders? thesis is simple: tap into attention/liquidity on solana. you buy solana coin low. you sell solana coin high. you have more money. don't sell your base higher. move on im not endorsing this specific coin, only because idk who's behind it. burns and account activity are instilling confidence but can't say you should trust this. [cont. ↓]

7 replies

1 recast

12 reactions

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑ pfp

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑

@cryptoforchange

Vamp attack Just bid $higher on base… like why do people gotta try and complicate stuff lol

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

colfax pfp

wdym by vamp attack, dilution? just mentioned to jason that i don't really know that term lol tbh my bags are sufficiently packed with higher on base [for me] and ive got sol wallets for gamba over there, so why not is my thought. not fully convinced that people will dump base higher for sol. could definitely be wrong there tho you also concerned about divided attention im assuming?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑ pfp

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑

@cryptoforchange

There is no need for the other higher token on $SOL Will only confuse people and could very well divide the community if it were to take off and grow. At that point which $higher is the real $higher and no it cant be both. Just look at how communities divide when forks happen creator still in the wind and we don't know why they created it and keep using anon accounts to promote. If you want $higher on Solana just bridge it over there. Also just me personally but this just continues to show that people would rather just chase gains then actually try to build value in the current project. But then again what utility does the current token even have. Not like anyone is using it anyway so why not. is wat is

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

colfax pfp

i agree with most of what you’ve said, tho i think i’m a bit more curious. as higher progresses, i can see a world where there are 10-20 tokens surrounding higher, like virtuals, tho ideally higher pairs tbf. so we’re on the same page there. creators are doxxed now @nickysap @brykayne with a plan for vesting/distribution to higher base holders. imo the most intriguing part of this is the fact that this could potentially be the best [currently only] option to fund higher creators, which has been the biggest topic of late, and 1 of 2 things holding the network back. 1. no money 2. who’s gonna do xyz to your point, the sad part about the crypto industry, is that building something is often times the worst r/r when trying to make money that said, the beauty of higher and the crypto sphere in general, is that the market will decide. i’ll ride to zero if that’s how it plays out. tho ideally the network can profit and use funds to help pay ourselves to build upon higher

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑ pfp

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑

@cryptoforchange

Tokens surrounding higher should not be called higher using that same image and trying to vamp off the original. Should be unique and actually interesting

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions