Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
It's obvious that we specify the license type in our Open Source GitHub repos. Why we don't do it with NFTs? Great essay about crypto in general, sniped by @thatalexpalmer.eth
2 replies
3 recasts
13 reactions
Claus Wilke
@clauswilke
I couldn't be bothered reading the whole thing but the part about NFTs and licenses is complete nonsense. (i) It's confused about why NFTs do or don't have value. (If you buy art you also don't get a copyright license.) (ii) It's confused about how licensing actually works.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
(i) you don't get the license when you buy tradart but some nfts let you create derivative works. why not make the licensing transparent like we do in Open Source? You might have a few predefined options to choose from and it's clear from Day 1. anyway I think @leashless-matr might be a better person to answer :)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Claus Wilke
@clauswilke
Sure licenses should be specified somehow. I just don't believe it would make much of a difference. objkt.com on Tezos asks you what license you want to attach to your NFT, and then displays it prominently (scroll to the bottom). https://objkt.com/asset/KT1WpTdiPCtWMQJuU8QGXRax9Jsdq9DmuHGM/0
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Claus Wilke
@clauswilke
According to the article, therefore, NFTs on Tezos should be worth way more because they have licenses attached, but that's not at all true as far as I can tell. In fact, in my experience people generally don't care about licenses.
1 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
