Crypto's inverse problem is that it has meaningful distribution, but it lacks enough differentiated and meaningful shit to keep people around.

Instead of just finding land, developing homes and hoping community fosters through a shared space, crypto needs to invest in making sure individual buyers get value out of their experience (shit people care about and come back for).

I agree with this sentiment, but I also feel like saying this stuff is falling on deaf ears in crypto rn. There are of course exceptions, but in general do you feel like this sentiment is resonating with people who are actually building in the space or who have been successful to date?

Onchain record label.

Home of @angelbaby

Working toward a more self-sovereign, creative, kind internet. Husband. Dad. ❤️: 🦉, 🎮, 💻, ⛳,🎸🤘🏻. FC OG | FID442 chriskurdziel.com

yes there are a bunch (@hume being one) but I do think capital is disinterested in it which drives downstream effects to what people build and where they think they'll get support. starts with capital and the that is weak with vision IMO ATM