burmesep8552
@civet1600
417 Following
91 Followers
1 reply
7 recasts
36 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
13 replies
74 recasts
506 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Some chatter on this, especially around the “eat their lunch” phrasing
My perspective as a user:
Warpcast has a difficult role to play: as the largest product on the Farcaster protocol, their actions will drive the majority of new user growth
Along the way, there will be other apps that emerge to fill gaps in the Warpcast value prop. Scheduled casts, onchain actions, real time chat, etc
As those features are validated by users, the Warpcast team is then faced with a choice: integrate these features into the main app (thereby stimulating growth), or intentionally avoid building it to reduce competition with ecosystem partners
The rub: if Farcaster doesn’t significantly grow, then all ecosystem apps will likely die anyway due to lack of sufficient users.
My personal framework around this topic is less vibes driven and more realpolitik; as an app builder, you have to be prepared for your great feature idea to be copied as soon as it’s proven to be successful with users. 7 replies
27 recasts
208 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
1 recast
24 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
10 replies
17 recasts
114 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
6 replies
45 recasts
207 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction