Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
Just updated the "Auth Addresses" FIP with a more detailed plan for implementation. We can introduce auth addresses without any changes to the existing contracts or new deployments. If you use SIWF, build a client, or use mini app auth, you may be interested! https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/225
3 replies
5 recasts
21 reactions

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
Tagging participants already in the discussion: @vrypan.eth @manan @christopher @andrei0x309 @sinaver.eth
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
We should also nail down the limits to auth addresses. Can an auth address change/update a username? (no) Can an auth address be able to transfer FIDs in case access is lost on the custodial app? (no)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
Oops, the username proof should be a yes.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction