Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

christin pfp
christin
@christin
some thoughts and questions given recent news re: "interesting content," changes to how channels work to me, social platforms are marketplaces with "buyers" and "sellers" (in this case, of content) - creators are "sellers" of their content goods - enjoyoors / vibing / curators are "buyers" as a content creator type on fc, i have expressed my concerns that the current fc algorithms punish new users too hard, which reduces possible audience sizes and makes the place not attractive to content creator types (and not fun for content consumers either!) (i also want to emphasize that i myself am a "buyer" on other platforms like instagram, youtube, etc.! there is no value judgement to be either and we often play both roles.) so what if instead, *user intent* is composable? similar to how in role-playing games, you can play as characters with diff types of specialization and it's set "per session," since sometimes I want to broadcast and share my content, and other times, support my friends with theirs
24 replies
8 recasts
46 reactions

christopher carfi pfp
christopher carfi
@ccarfi
where is the “i write or create for fun, self expression, and to pebble with my friends, and not as part of an optimization function” quadrant?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

christin pfp
christin
@christin
🥹 free from quadrants
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

christopher carfi pfp
christopher carfi
@ccarfi
that “free from quadrants” not-a-quadrant is the not-a-quadrant I want to be in 😉
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction