Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/ted
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
strong opinion, somewhat strongly held: creatives don't want to create for "content traders" the word "trader" is inherently transactional — someone primarily seeking profit, optimizing for price movement without emotional or philosophical attachment to the asset itself idk a single creative who seeks that out
40 replies
19 recasts
186 reactions
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
I agree with this take — but I think it's a false equivalence to say that coining content == *creating for content traders* secondary markets have existed for all assets, forever. this is true with paintings, NFTs, and yes, coins. and creators/artists have created for a mix of themselves, their collectors, and yes, people who have bought and sold their pieces. there has always been an inherent tension between who one creates for. coining content is very stigmatized because it has been historically something that *has* been transactional. but people said the same thing about open edition mints. and they said the same thing about uploading videos on tiktok and instagram. the thesis is that coining can serve as a better distribution channel *and* a better monetization channel for creators. it can do this because it can flow more freely and more people can participate. i think it's reasonable to disagree on whether you think that happens — but let's have that conversation, not be anchored to stigma.
7 replies
2 recasts
36 reactions
Chris Comrie
@chriscomrie
Agree with parts of both yall and do like the takes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
