Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
blue hour in the the battery
9 replies
4 recasts
41 reactions
ChrisCoCreated
@chriscocreated
π Given youβre doing one by ones on Zora, whatβs your plans for your 16 x 9 Work these days?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
lol you had to know this question would hurt!!! I'm sorta working on a project which is 16:9, but the drop isn't fully formed. not sure abt zora bc i feel it requires metadata. maybe overthinking it. but that's a very specific body of work and i'll still have a lot that idk what to do with πͺ¦
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ChrisCoCreated
@chriscocreated
sooorry!! what would you use if not Zora? Highlight? Your thesis is that Zora has the only functional secondary marketplace, right? So the current tradeoff is no functioning secondary vs not displaying properly. correct?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
Exactly. I really don't wanna use anything else, distribution and secondary are too strong. Highlight doesn't have that dist despite being the right interface. I want to get this project out and maybe I have to just let go of the metadata itch. The theme revolves around memories I want to lose so...Not to mention metadata requires immense time and effort. Chronological works. Thanks for the push here!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ChrisCoCreated
@chriscocreated
Love the sound of that. Maybe the way to think about it is to push the work out, with a view to updating the metadata (if you want to) when the project gets traction? - it's still possible at a contract level right?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
That's a great point. Should it feel worth the second effort it's possible and perhaps an interface will support it!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction