Deployer
@deployer
I've seen mixed reactions to Zora combining pictures and tokens. I could be wrong but this feels ... right. It's fascinating. Its like fractionalizing NFTs without having to fractionalize a thing. You can own a lot or you can own a little. You can flex being the biggest holder, or you can just support your favorite artist with $5. The only thing that separates this from existing 1/1s or open editions is how platforms display them. By owning any amount of these tokens you own "the picture". The amount you put in is up to you. I get the sense artists hate this because it further pushes art into some kind of financial asset, but this is fascinating and I hope more artists use it and it catches on. NFTs were always financial. Artists wanted a new way to monetize their work. They required a mental leap to embrace a new concept of ownership. Seems like that is also the case here. This solves the royalty debate. I assume the artist earns fees on every swap.
24 replies
32 recasts
163 reactions
checkpoint
@checkpoint
ERC 404 at least gave you a hint about price. Art run was good imo. Cause you can Hold it as NFT too. This is just a pump fun token or clanker token no diff. Can you tell me What is fascinating cuz hard to understand it by me. What is the diff one artist Launch clanker with his/her art vs launch a token on zora? Looks like it is just aiming bring more people to base. (Most of them will stay away after it) Cause zora has many followers. That is it imo.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions