Charlie pfp

Charlie

@chcharcharlie

2 Following
68 Followers


Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
There are already cameras being built with secure chips in it so that every photo being taken has a digital signature saying that it went through the optic sensors so not digitally faked. Together with ZK (for image processing), Is this good enough to protect us from being surrounded by fake AI images?
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
Posted a summary of what we've previously built with @tlsnotary. It's really a powerful tech that we believe is gradually taking off and showing its value. Towards the trustless and verifiable internet. https://x.com/chcharcharlie/status/1796268960259748080
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
Found quite a few interesting books on @a16zcrypto bookshelf. Going to take this ZKP ELI5 one back and gift it to a friend's 5 year old son, see if we can make any progress there lol. Personally though I think 5ys old lost the chance as soon as you start calling out "circuits" and "gates" 🀣
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
What exactly can we call verifiable compute? Most signatures/attestations introduce trust over the signers or issuers. PoS relies on honest majority assumptions, even ZK needs some trust setup. Is there something that can be truly trustless, or are we just minimizing the trust?
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
Solo hotpot. Level 5 Lonely challenge completed.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
How do people usually manage expectations over farcaster's eventual consistency? What do you do when there's notification about a reaction/reply but when you click in it doesn't show up?
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
This in my mind should be the default way to decentralize the `aggregator` role in most AVSes. It provides liveness guarantees and censorship resistance sufficiently enough comparing to being fully decentralized. A little more game theory design should also prevent the aggregator to purposefully reject connections.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
zkLogin + @zkpassport will be the web3 onboarding endgame. When you zkLogin with social accounts, you prove signed JWT tokens. ePassports also have signature you can prove out of, and with this: 1. You don't rely on giant web2 companies 2. There would be default sybil resistance and potential kyc capabilities
5 replies
2 recasts
33 reactions

Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
Recently though glad to see more and more people starting to clarify how many applications are just SNARK or Verifiable and has nothing to do with ZK and refusing the buzzword to be miss-used. Question is do ZKasino even have SNARK? πŸ™ƒ
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
How much security do you really need and how should they really work when building with the affordable security pool /eigenlayer brings? Quite a few eigen projects are building faster finality using cheap security, but then should used security be locked for the dispute period? which then making them no longer cheap?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
Today's learning reading on BLS signature aggregations. https://crypto.stanford.edu/~dabo/pubs/papers/BLSmultisig.html We all know BLS signature aggregation helps reduce the amount of pairings needed when validating signatures from N signers. But what if they are signing on different messages?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
Any kind of real estate is by far the best type of cash flow business. (Inspiration coming from renewing my @ensdomains ...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
Had a great gathering with some of the best crypto hackers and builders @eulerlagrange.eth @mac- ... , as well as the coolest @pse team @tlsnotary in Amsterdam. Great vibes
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Charlie pfp
Charlie
@chcharcharlie
gm
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction