Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Michael Silberling pfp
Michael Silberling
@msilb7
What influence (if any) does lower user transaction fees have on “consumer user” activity on OP Chains? Likely could start by comparing time periods with low L1 gas prices versus high L1 gas prices, post-Bedrock (modern fee model). Consumer = humans pressing buttons on a website, not bots
7 replies
1 recast
4 reactions

Charlie Marketplace pfp
Charlie Marketplace
@charliemktplace
I don't think this is the right framing. Lower tx costs means it's even easier to write contracts, test in prod, and create new types of bundled transaction protocols. It is these new automations that will bring humans clicking the button I think. 4844 has inspired my own DEX research interest which I'll productize
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Charlie Marketplace pfp
Charlie Marketplace
@charliemktplace
Even now, I have Coinbase wallet and friends on it. But the UX of doing anything interesting (e.g. collabing on liquidity) is so weak i never get to use message feature. Low costs = more contract innovation = better UX. Why don't we Uni v3 position with a single raw ETH transfer? Too much lost to fees + atomicity!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Michael Silberling pfp
Michael Silberling
@msilb7
Yeah I was thinking of what like a “consumer today” is. Assuming that running automations is still super sophisticated. But yeah I’d love to get to a point where I can have some automation/AI running on my behalf. So maybe cut the “consumer” filter, but transaction pattern could still be a segment.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction