Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Catabolismo pfp
Catabolismo
@catabolismo
I don't find this aesthetically pleasing. The faces in particular have that soulless model pose that MJ makes. But you can't say this person isn't a "creator". Whatever that means, he evidently put lots of time and resources into making a homage to his favorite director. For me this is enough to consider it art, regardless of the tool he made it with. https://x.com/PJaccetturo/status/1841884941724065984?t=4uE1LuVIpoRh7MPL5_CfDA&s=19
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Chainleft pfp
Chainleft
@chainleft
Ehh, all we know about his time & resources is what he told us. In terms of writing, he copied the original trailer shots. In terms of prompts, no effort seems to have been put into costumes, frame-cuts, angles... Even with AI, this could've been done a lot better. I think this is my primary problem with AI art: There are 0.01% great AI artists who convey emotions or thoughts with this new tool, but there are a lot more grifters than other art types who suddenly think they're able to skip ALL the steps (when some of these steps include conveying qualia)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Catabolismo pfp
Catabolismo
@catabolismo
Yes, still a long way to go. Just felt bad for the guy with everyone trashing at him at the other app, I do think he did his best. And I also agree that what's missing is mostly a critical understanding of the tool's role, rather than a technical refinement of its possibilities.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction