The easiest way to evangelize a new social network is to tell someone there is an audience for their interests/ content type “already built in.” 

Channels helped organize users by topic to show what kind of audience you could get. 

I will die on this hill and probably eventually drop off farcaster because of it but at least I spoke my mind before I did.

How many people agree secretly with this channels take? 

How many people see opportunity and are watching the opportunity be passed by? 

Merkle says we are in the minority and so our take bears no weight. 

But what if channels were cultivated to enable long form discussion. 

So much here.

❤️Cozy➗writing➗music➗movies➗/woodenboats 💌start a conversation with me here🟰 https://shorturl.at/moT16 | meganmichelle.com 

in all honesty, it's their product and this could still be considered beta. imo channels are friction to normies. I'm sure they've thought it out and spent a lot of time 

they are cool but we simply just need more people, every channel is a spam fest. best posters don't ever use them unless ironically 

more channel focus won't bring new ppl. the potential for crypto natives is tapped. we need new blood

I do but I pay attention to a lot but I'm biased because I want to see farcaster win 

it's a cultural thing. we just have to outpace CT

“channel are friction to normies” ok so what is the normie attraction strategy we’re seeing unfold here? I’m not seeing one. Are you?