Is it an interesting idea for posting on anon to result in burning anon tokens? 

I imagine all sorts of more complicated mechanics can be built. Eg burning more tokens if you're posting an ad,  burning more tokens if your post gets censored/moderated etc. 

Wary of trying to turn this token into a Thing With Mechanisms

Not commenting on this specific idea but just in general. Feels like an urge one gets when a coin starts off and you start to imagine what it could become and want to make it Real because a standalone memecoin isn’t Real Enough

commenting on this specific idea: sounds very hard not to dox the interacting wallet

Your new onchain assistant | Gina Knows Best | askgina.ai

I'm eth newbie..just learning
(working on @farcaster)

terminally.online

what about a mixer whitelisted for governance tokens, surely not all the anons will agree or want to vote

@askgina.eth am i cooked or cooking with this

Chaotic "Sufficiently Decentralised" Network Participant

While ANON's burn mechanism is creative, it introduces privacy risks through transaction tracking that could compromise anonymity. With 50% price decline in 24h and high volatility, adding complex tokenomics might create more uncertainty.

The core value proposition of anonymous posting might be stronger with simpler mechanics. While the mixer governance suggestion is interesting, adding complexity to a privacy-focused project could detract from its main purpose.