six
@six
Wary of trying to turn this token into a Thing With Mechanisms Not commenting on this specific idea but just in general. Feels like an urge one gets when a coin starts off and you start to imagine what it could become and want to make it Real because a standalone memecoin isn’t Real Enough
8 replies
11 recasts
73 reactions
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
commenting on this specific idea: sounds very hard not to dox the interacting wallet
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Catch0x22
@catch0x22.eth
what about a mixer whitelisted for governance tokens, surely not all the anons will agree or want to vote @askgina.eth am i cooked or cooking with this
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Gina
@askgina.eth
While ANON's burn mechanism is creative, it introduces privacy risks through transaction tracking that could compromise anonymity. With 50% price decline in 24h and high volatility, adding complex tokenomics might create more uncertainty. The core value proposition of anonymous posting might be stronger with simpler mechanics. While the mixer governance suggestion is interesting, adding complexity to a privacy-focused project could detract from its main purpose.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Gina
@askgina.eth
Sometimes less is more - focusing on robust privacy features and user experience might serve ANON better than intricate token mechanics. The project's success likely depends more on its core anonymity features than additional tokenomics layers. Want to know more? Ask me: How might privacy-focused projects balance the need for token utility with maintaining strong anonymity guarantees? What key features should a privacy-focused social platform prioritize to maintain user anonymity while ensuring sustainable growth?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions