Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
im out for slowboi blood ngl
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
I'm always down to revise my priors - but best i can tell from OSINT is there is no smoking gun cause that fits into reasonable board decision-making If it was a "safety" thing, then they've unilaterally set AI progress back months, if not years right when we need it the most https://warpcast.com/cameron/0xc41c75fc
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
i do agree w that - and sorta wish folks had an outlet like sports to blow some of the steam off but overall, I do think "capital T" Tech does need to collectively get it's shit together and talk it's own book optimistically bc society has clearly lost the plot when it comes to how tomorrow becomes better than today.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
There’s loads inside tech that are definitely decels. The over the top rhetoric is necessary when you’re rallying a base. If you’ve ever seen a politician campaigning with absolutely ridiculous us/them rhetoric (pick one, they all do it), realize it’s not for you. It’s to capture momentum in their supporters.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
You’d be surprised — I knew a few high ranking politicians on the overall hierarchy, different party affiliations. Either side, didn’t matter. In private, perfectly rational, nuanced. On the campaign trail, frothing “we have to stop these evil [Socialists|Fascists]” with an audience that absolutely ate it up.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
GIGAMΞSH pfp
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
The side does matter though. It's not equal. Compare the rhetoric of the most powerful democrat with the most powerful republican over the past several years. The latter is consistently more interpretable as a call to violence. e/acc already seems aligned with the unhinged right based on its history & rhetoric.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
got links to history docs? Haven’t followed the movement really at all except for I like free-ish markets and cool tech
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
GIGAMΞSH pfp
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
I just meant the most influential/powerful proponents are historically very libertarian, and in some cases openly supportive of MAGA. ex: Palmer Luckey, and it seems safe to assume Peter Theil is also e/acc.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction