Introducing: Seemore qDAU Score 👀

If we want Farcaster to be the infra for a new social internet...

We gotta build public goods to accelerate alt clients AND those goods can't be held captive by the incentives of crypto giants  

Plus scores are fun to argue about 🫡

Introducing: Seemore qDAU Score 👀

If we want Farcaster to be the infra for a new social internet...

We gotta build public goods to accelerate alt clients AND those goods can't be held captive by the incentives of crypto giants  

Plus scores are fun to argue about 🫡

https://seemore.tv/creatortools/qdauscore

/cameron for content experiments. I help Creators grow faster @ seemore.tv + /seemore. Curating in /lounge. 
Dev + Veteran + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

We know the score is wrong 😬

But we want to start the conversation. 

We think the concept of a "cast engagement score" adjusted by Follower count is an okay start.

Join us as we make an OSS repo and let's figure out a way for new client devs to get a user quality algo that is fair, reasonable, and just works!

Things we want to dial in:

- How much should high follower counts penalize your score? rn it isn't high enough, but many followers are inactive so we're overcounting

- Are our action weights (reply vs recast vs like) aligned w what a qDAU is?

- How do we measure less obvious qDAU actions like community leadership?

I don't understand point 2 of methodology. Maybe, it's because I just woke up. Do you divide the number of followers by 60k, etc? Or is it an if else expression?