Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
🗿
@bias
to be clear leaving this bubbling undercurrent unaddressed to fester in the shadows and shame will only result in churn of some healthy, quality and valid contributors to this network sunlight is the best disinfectant official nuanced discussions need to be held, and asap, @dwr.eth, @v for the future of the network
1 reply
3 recasts
13 reactions
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
genuinely trying to understand - what's to discuss? they're pretty clear about handling bots (some $$$ to stem the massive tide, filter the bots that pay, focusing on user defaults vs power user tools) they share DAU #s and get slammed regularly if they shared a qDAU # too they'd also get slammed about defining it?
4 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Syed Shah🏴☠️🌊
@syed
Yeah I’m wondering where to look for this bubbling undercurrent. Genuinely
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jacob
@jrf
i think the wc team is doing a great job at allowing the protocol to grow neutrally while innovating on client features to improve the quality of the user experience but if @geoffgolberg is right about what he's claiming, that's not good if he's wrong, someone prove him wrong, and we can go back to our memes
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Would you find it useful if Merkle were to create distinction between accounts and users? https://warpcast.com/deodad/0x6eab7d74
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ignas Peciura Ⓜ️
@ipeciura.eth
Agreed. Why is everyone on about "let's discuss". Offer something, share wisdom instead of complaining and pointing fingers 🤷♀️
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
