Warpcast

Disliking the idea that questions born from curiosity can be interpreted as “engagement farming”.

Feeling it can tip communities or societies into different paths.

cto @ bwl.gg (lunchbreak.com), 80M+ users (bdut.ch) 🙏 built @remindme, @mintit, @gpt, @healthbot, farcantasy.xyz

engagement farming via questions is totally ok

We’ve been through the “engagement farming” debate before when the network was small and the only incentive for asking questions was to get on the highlight tab. 

Now that financial incentives like Moxie exist:

What do you think?

We’ve been through the “engagement farming” debate before when the network was small and the only incentive for asking questions was to get on the highlight tab. 

Now that financial incentives like Moxie exist:

What do you think? 

https://warpcast.com/les/0xc61f63e6 

https://warpcast.com/v/0xa83219b6

𝓵𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓵𝓮𝓼𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓶𝓶𝓮𝓻 • building @buoy 🛟 • skeet.build • pfista.com

2 things are true:

- inauthentic question baiting generally results in bad content

- a lot of people still love to shove bad content straight into their faceholes

same as it ever was 🤷‍♂️

weird internet kid. word rotator. building /seemore. yapping on /okbanger. curating in /cameron + pdfproject.org | dev + vet + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

Yea that’s my default too

I probably tend to give the benefit of the doubt too much but it’s w/e

So why not ignore and disengage inauthentic questions? That’s what I do

Things tend to work themselves out