Farcaster

Hi Casters. I promised a follow up to yesterday's post on AI being the native business model for content. Here is that follow up post

Hi Casters. I promised a follow up to yesterday's post on AI being the native business model for content. Here is that follow up post https://avc.xyz/minting-is-the-native-business-model-for-web3-and-maybe-ai-too

I appreciate this might be in the next post, but are there any examples in the wild of a median user revealed preference to own their “own” interest graph data (or even do micropayments)?

weird internet kid. helping Creators with /seemore. yapping on /okbanger. curating in /cameron + pdfproject.org | dev + veteran + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

Building /seedclub 🌱 /consumercrypto 

Make something people want to be a part of

I'd like that to be true, but we don't really "own" our data here in a robust way (can pay for temp storage, but actions expire and follows aren't in the protocol)

We don't do micropayments at any kind of scale

Also there are only 2500 DAUs

The open web is dead, long live the open web. ⌐◨-◨

Building /warpcast and /farcaster

— gabrielayuso.com

Agree with Point #1

Disagree with Point #2 - Users complain about paying for Creators stuff (and any stuff really) all the time.

#3 is true in theory, but again that's why I asked for examples in the wild.

Users might not care (yet) but creators do.
Users that care about a creator's content will happily pay for it.
Other users might not pay directly for the content but they pay with attention which can be monetized and creators can be compensated for it.

The model hasn't been cracked yet but we can experiment and learn