Cristian Strat

@c

157 Following

729 Followers

Cristian Strat pfp

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tumDmtLH9Y&ab_channel=TheCurrent

0 reply

2 recasts

16 reactions

Cristian Strat pfp

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Cristian Strat pfp

https://x.com/heartereum/status/1892182277288796252

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Cristian Strat pfp

The grift was so strong with this one that even those who were nominally in the trenches got burned. Then, the Coffeezilla/Hayden Davis interview revealed staggering cynicism; it left me speechless even if I generally assumed the worst of these guys.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Cristian Strat pfp

love this observation! at a smaller scale, this reminds me of a meme that politicians say with a straight face every four years: “This is the most important election of our lifetime!”

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Cristian Strat pfp

you guys set goals?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Cristian Strat pfp

my love language

2 replies

10 recasts

121 reactions

Cristian Strat pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Cristian Strat pfp

So it’s a data problem, but more specifically data interpretation in the domain of accounting and tax. Somewhat related, it would be really useful to have some standards or at least a shared repository of inferences of tax/accounting properties from common transaction types. Make this parsing consistent across tax products.

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Cristian Strat pfp

I agree with the “data problem” point in general, though perhaps in a slightly different way. Tx parsing and enrichment is a core competency needed, but I see 90% of the challenge being primarily in the tax/accounting domain logic - countless cases where you must infer the accounting/tax semantics given ideal full onchain information including traces and whatnot, and only 10% is general low-level onchain infrastructure of the sort you can buy from Alchemy/similar.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Cristian Strat pfp

Can you link to an explorer showing incorrect data? I understand it can be unparsed or insufficiently enriched but not sure what you mean by explorer being incorrect. TokenTax/similar being incorrect - that is easy to see of course, no examples needed.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Cristian Strat pfp

Not sure I get this example. Most/all AMM contracts emit decently detailed events. Those plus the ERC20 events should suffice for most AMM transactions, no? If there’s a really wonky tx they can trace that with a hosted node provider. No?

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Cristian Strat pfp

https://youtu.be/Bfp-cnhExnE?t=57&si=ZeXaUBRNMBGdc6V6

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Cristian Strat pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Cristian Strat pfp

Safe is good, but I would like something simpler

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Cristian Strat pfp

Can you recommend an open-source wallet contract that implements basic deposits/withdrawals/permissions, plus "multicall" batch writes? In other words, a contract that holds some tokens and can perform arbitrary actions when directed by an EOA with appropriate permissions. Thanks!

2 replies

2 recasts

8 reactions

Cristian Strat pfp

this is what mastery, joy, and flow look like, when combined https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxYX-u7RsSo&ab_channel=JessBowen

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Cristian Strat pfp

It's a mindfuck how folks invented calculus, topology, linear algebra, analytic geometry, probabilities, etc. in the fucking 1600s! This shit is still HARD 400 years later, when it's spoon-fed 12 years in school, with 3blue1brown explainers and AI tutors. The average person today can easily grasp 400yo tech. The printing press, windmill, cannon, plow, etc. are trivial contraptions by modern standards; even a smol brain knows how they work. But math invented 400 years ago? Utterly incomprehensible alien speak, a mile above the average person's head.

0 reply

0 recast

7 reactions

Cristian Strat pfp

Robot Heart FTW

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Cristian Strat pfp

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdFmMT6oyaw&t=18s&ab_channel=TenSecondSongs

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction