Design

Genuine question: Do ya’ll think there will come a time that artists/designers won’t be able to compete with AI? The sheer amount of work produced in one generation from 1 prompt (say 100k pieces) is more than I could produce by hand in my lifetime. Even if it was a purely digital work.

(1 of 2)

@trashnfts @atxdao @atxwiw3 + og @stargaze artist⭐️ + UX Dev/Design by day☁️ + Kiki Machine🎸
Ex google, Walmart labs
https://linktr.ee/artichokelord

Imagine it's the late 90s. You ask Kasparov if there will be a time when humans chess players will no longer compete with computers. What do you think he'd say? 

I believe trying to compete with AI art is the wrong way to think about it. There would be AI-art and human-art. Some will likely prefer one over the other.

fan of the scientific method; enjoyer of Socratic Dialogue; never been wrong in my life; btw what is a 'sarcasm'?

In the 90s humans used to try to outperform computers at chess, similar to how many in the arts industry are trying to do today. Today, outperforming a computer at chess is futile.

Yet people still conduct chess tournaments, because its a human v. human endeavour. Anyone who doesn't find value in that is ngmi.

Can you explain the chess analogy here? 

Not connecting how it’s related to the topic at hand, I do see the parallels in controversy though!

There is already ai art, human art, and a hybrid of both. I’m keen on the latter & partake in that! It’s valuable to collaborate with AI as creative humans, but I can see why folks see it as competition as well. That’s why I posed the question.