GC and Investment Partner @variant | tweets are not legal advice | I am not your lawyer

I’m particularly interested in a couple loose ideas right now:

(1) Agents as entertainment - the agent’s interactions with others on social is entertaining in and of itself. The agent builds “real” relationships, has drama, etc. Going deeper than just what it casts.
(2) Tokenizing agents - allowing tokenholders to participate in the agent’s decision-making, including the narrative playing out in (1).
(3) Agents that leverage composability and interoperability outside of Farcaster.

Related to (2), who is working on an agent that responds to the price of its own token?

That is - the price of the agent’s token automatically adjusts the behavior of the agent. Tokenholders signal approval or disapproval of the model’s current parameters/actions through buying and selling the token. (I like @jesse’s term for this, “price is governance”).

Could be an interesting way to get around the cumbersome voting process - like how prediction markets are replacing the painful and inaccurate process of traditional polling. “Push vs. pull,” where money talks.

GC and Investment Partner @variant | casts are not legal advice | I am not your lawyer

Would be awesome if every 10x it could order a box of champagne